Ein Wert den Fischländer gestern vorgestellt hat. Fett abgegangen, hier lege ich mich mal auf die Lauer!!
Pinnacle Digest: New Resource Estimate Initiates Immediate Review
5/25/2007
May 25, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX News Network) --
To read this article in its entirety, visit us at www.pinnacledigest.com.
Tyler Resources (TSX-V:TYS) experienced a 70% explosion in share value Thursday coupled by 15,546,520 shares traded. On May 24th they reported results of the second resource estimate calculations prepared by Associated Geosciences Ltd., including new drilling data from July 15th, 2006 to March 31 2007 within the Main Deposit of its Bahuerachi Project. This has caught the attention of our researchers at PinnacleDigest and we have since begun evaluating this company in respect to their position within the market. We are focused on this company's immediate future objectives and will be reviewing them further. To read this article in full and to learn more about our expanding, diverse online financial magazine, visit us at www.pinnacledigest.com.
Canadian stocks retreated Thursday for the first time in over a week. The decline was led by mining and energy stocks as they have risen substantially of late. Teck Cominco Ltd. led the decline Thursday falling 4% after the stock was adjusted to sector perform' from outperform' by analyst Fraser Phillips at RBC Capital Markets. Toronto's S&P/TSX composite lost 196.24 points dropping below 14,000.00 to 13,946.27. The TSX Venture Exchange lost 72.93 points to close at 3205.99.
The price of crude oil dropped 2.4% to $64.18 a barrel, the largest one day drop since April 1st. Copper fell 3.5% to a seven week low on concern that inventories in China are set to rise. The spot price of gold dropped $8.76 to close at 653.17 an ounce. On the economic side, Statistics Canada reported retail sales surged 1.9% in March to $34 billion, much more than the 0.7% rise economists had expected. This provides a fulfilled sentiment regarding the economy, but overall consumer sentiment is something that must be monitored carefully.
The U.S. economy grew modestly in the first three months of 2007, but is said to pick up as the year progresses stated, Deputy U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Kimmitt on Saturday. We have decided to focus greatly on this man's comments as we know there is much to learn from his thoughts on these main issues.
Let's turn back to Tyler Resources and learn more about this company's objectives and focus moving forward. We are reviewing the summary of measured, indicated, and inferred resources defined to date by Tyler Resources. It should be reiterated that the new resource estimate shows significant increases in contained metals in the critical higher confidence Measured and Indicated categories at a 0.2% Copper Cutoff grade as follows: Copper more than tripled from 1.44 billion pounds to 4.56 billion pounds (217% increase), molybdenum went from 26.67 million pounds to 96.19 million pounds (261% increase), silver went from 18.39 million ounces to 67.95 million ounces (270% increase), gold from 216,529 ounces to 550,626 (154% increase) and zinc from 248.92 million pounds to 6,308 million pounds (2,434 % increase). These increases are stunning and have led us to begin a progressive review upon Tyler Resources. To follow up with Tyler Resources and to find out exactly how our online financial magazine can benefit you as an investor, visit us at www.pinnacledigest.com.
To continue with this report as well as other related articles, please visit www.pinnacledigest.com for a complimentary membership. It should be stated that our membership requires no commitment to our service. If you would like to contact us please write to support@pinnacledigest.com.
PinnacleDigest has no vested interest in the company mentioned herein. This source of information is from an unbiased perspective. If you wish to become a member of www.pinnacledigest.com you will be gaining access to articles similar to this one and many other useful services we know you will find valuable. Keeping you educated and up-to-date with the market is one of our main purposes. Our approach in achieving this goal and our ability to consistently deliver high quality investment material is what defines our business model.
Investors seeking a distinctive approach to investing should also visit www.pinnacledigest.com for a complimentary membership.
About Pinnacle Digest
Pinnacledigest.com is an emerging online financial newsletter community. We put together informative material, capturing the information that we know will give you an edge to your portfolio and more specifically your investment approach.
Once a member of PinnacleDigest you will be able to access our complimentary full-length research reports on selected companies, our weekly volumes, and our market overviews. In addition to these services we are confident you will enjoy our many other services, as well as our main feature which is available to all our members.
We pride ourselves in having a multi purpose online magazine and encourage you to join our community.
This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy securities in any jurisdiction.
All material herein was prepared by Pinnacledigest.com (Pinnacle Digest) based upon information believed to be reliable. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by Pinnacledigest.com to be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive. The companies that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this opinion. This opinion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. Pinnacledigest.com is not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. Please consult a broker before purchasing or selling any securities viewed on or mentioned herein. Pinnacledigest.com may receive compensation in cash or shares from independent third parties or from the companies mentioned.
Pinnacledigest.com will not advise as to when it decides to sell and does not and will not offer any opinion as to when others should sell; each investor must make that decision based on his or her judgment of the market.
This release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. "Forward-looking statements" describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies and are generally preceded by words such as "may", "future", "plan" or "planned", "will" or "should", "expected," "anticipates", "draft", "eventually" or "projected". You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, and other risks identified in a companies' annual report on Form 10-K or 10-KSB and other filings made by such company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
You should consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements included herein, and not place undue reliance on such statements. The forward-looking statements in this release are made as of the date hereof and Pinnacledigest.com undertakes no obligation to update such statements.
M2 Communications Ltd disclaims all liability for information provided within M2 PressWIRE. Data supplied by named party/parties. Further information on M2 PressWIRE can be obtained at http://www.presswire.net on the world wide web. Inquiries to info@m2.com.
(C)1994-2007 M2 COMMUNICATIONS LTD
Tyler Resources More Than Triples Measured and Indicated Copper Mineral Inventory to 4.56 Billion Pounds and Adds 6 Billion Pounds Zinc at Bahuerachi Deposit, Mexico
5/23/2007
Second resource estimate outlines 4.56 and 0.67 billion pounds contained Copper in the Measured+Indicated and Inferred categories respectively, as well as 96.19 and 12.42 million pounds Molybdenum, 67.95 and 8.03 million ounces Silver, and 6.3 and 0.80 billion pounds Zinc at Bahuerachi Deposit.
CALGARY, ALBERTA, May 23, 2007 (CCNMatthews via COMTEX News Network) --
Tyler Resources (TSX VENTURE:TYS) is extremely pleased to report results of the second resource estimate calculations prepared by Associated Geosciences Ltd., including new drilling data from July 15th, 2006 to March 31 2007 within the Main Deposit of its Bahuerachi Project.
The new resource estimate shows significant increases in contained metals in the critical higher confidence Measured and Indicated categories at a 0.2% Copper Cutoff grade as follows: Copper more than tripled from 1.44 billion pounds to 4.56 billion pounds (217% increase), molybdenum went from 26.67 million pounds to 96.19 million pounds (261% increase), silver went from 18.39 million ounces to 67.95 million ounces (270% increase), gold from 216,529 ounces to 550,626 (154% increase) and zinc from 248.92 million pounds to 6,308 million pounds (2,434 % increase).
This second resource estimate was based on a drilling database comprising 185 drill holes for a total of 42,643 meters of drilling which were compiled, interpreted and modeled within the Surpac Visions (R) mining and modeling software package. In addition to expanding the high grade skarn and porphyry domains modelled in the Initial Resource Estimate as released on September 25th, 2006, mineralization hosted to the east and west of the porphyry complex in calc-silicate skarns, limestones, marbles and sediments was calculated and outline a more accurate picture of the Main Deposit's emerging true potential. This second resource estimate does not include tonnage from known mineralized areas in either the South Lobe or North Lobe porphyry or Mina Mexicana Skarn Zones.
A summary of Measured, Indicated and Inferred resources defined to date at various copper as well as copper equivalent (CuEq) cutoff grades has been provided by Tyler's Independent Consultants and results are presented below:
BAHUERACHI MAIN DEPOSIT, Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources, based
strictly on Copper grade cut-offs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper In CuEq
% Situ Cu Au Ag Mo Zn (1)
cutoff Category Tonnes % g/t g/t % % %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.1 Measured 127,776,630 0.38 0.04 3.33 0.008 0.41 0.56
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 780,641,161 0.28 0.02 3.04 0.007 0.45 0.45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 908,417,791 0.29 0.02 3.08 0.007 0.44 0.46
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 181,030,207 0.25 0.02 2.26 0.006 0.33 0.38
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.2 (2) Measured 92,398,260 0.47 0.05 3.86 0.008 0.44 0.67
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 432,111,525 0.38 0.03 4.07 0.008 0.57 0.60
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 524,509,785 0.40 0.03 4.03 0.008 0.55 0.61
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 80,174,744 0.38 0.02 3.11 0.007 0.45 0.55
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.3 Measured 61,245,978 0.58 0.06 4.64 0.006 0.52 0.81
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 243,605,237 0.48 0.04 5.13 0.007 0.68 0.74
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 304,851,215 0.50 0.04 5.03 0.007 0.65 0.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 49,658,919 0.47 0.03 3.57 0.006 0.51 0.65
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4 Measured 42,837,558 0.68 0.06 5.38 0.006 0.60 0.93
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 145,135,711 0.58 0.05 6.07 0.007 0.78 0.87
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 187,973,269 0.60 0.05 5.91 0.007 0.74 0.88
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 28,909,551 0.55 0.03 3.74 0.006 0.63 0.73
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 Measured 28,506,152 0.79 0.07 6.31 0.005 0.75 1.08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 90,885,421 0.65 0.05 6.95 0.007 0.90 0.98
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 119,391,573 0.69 0.06 6.79 0.007 0.86 1.01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 15,285,342 0.64 0.04 3.56 0.006 0.86 0.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Copper equivalents calculated using US$1.50/lb Cu, $10.00/lb Mo,
$7.00/oz Ag. Gold and Zinc were not factored in the copper equivalent
Calculation. Copper equivalents, metallurgical recoveries and net
smelter returns are assumed to be 100%.
(2) A 0.2% copper cutoff is consistent with, and in the case of oxide
material above cut off grades currently being used in Mexico at other
operations in this type of environment.
(3) For modeling purposes, all metal values were capped at the 99(th)
percentile of their normal population distribution.
BAHUERACHI MAIN ZONE, Contained metals based on Measured, Indicated and
Inferred Resource categories.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copper Copper Silver Molybdenum Zinc
% Million Gold Million Million Million
cutoff Category lbs Ounces Ounces lbs lbs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.1 Measured 1,064.10 152.615 13.67 22.34 1,149.74
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 4,764.27 556,893 76.23 122.33 7,703.51
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 5,828.38 709,508 89.90 144.67 8,853.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 1,005.01 93,518 13.16 22.58 1,319.79
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.2 Measured 947.02 134,322 11.46 16.16 902.03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 3,615.75 416,303 56.49 80.03 5,406.05
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 4,562.77 550,626 67.95 96.19 6,308.07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 673.77 56,334 8.03 12.42 797.49
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.3 Measured 776.84 109,321 9.13 8.67 702.81
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 2,589.52 295,383 40.21 38.57 3,644.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 3,366.36 404,704 49.34 47.24 4,347.33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 511.65 41,763 5.70 6.60 551.88
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4 Measured 636.59 88,134 7.41 5.35 566.55
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 1,837.34 216,53 28.33 23.40 2,491.37
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 2,473.93 304,668 35.74 28.74 3,057.92
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 347.52 29,086 3.48 3.79 399.88
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 Measured 495.57 68,061 5.8 3.44 472.31
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 1,308.30 159,536 20.3 14.78 1,797.12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 1,803.87 227,598 26.08 18.22 2,269.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 216.74 20,637 1.75 2.01 287.74
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
While a copper only cut off grade outlines a robust copper deposit on its own, the following tables outlines the influence of both silver and molybdenum on the overall resource model, and significantly increase the tonnage in most categories.
The Company also notes that zinc has now been outlined as being a very significant potential value contributor from mineralization hosted predominantly in skarns and sediments. While metallurgical testwork data available to date does not allow for the inclusion of zinc into the copper equivalent calculations, the Company notes simple mineralogy for the zinc mineralization and the fact that other operations in similar systems (such as the Antamina Mine in Peru) can routinely recover significant amounts of zinc from these deposits. The Company will conduct additional metallurgical testing which will seek to optimize and quantify the types of zinc recoveries that can be expected through floatation circuits at Bahuerachi to ensure that value from this newly outlined 6 billion pounds of zinc can be capitalized upon.
Given the overall distribution of different metals within the Bahuerachi deposit, the Company believes that a better illustration of the Deposit's potential is reflected in the table which outlines Resource tonnage and grade calculations based on copper equivalent cutoffs. Evaluating the deposit's tonnage and geometry on a CuEq cutoff basis highlights the fact that generally higher grade molybdenum systematically tends to occur with lower copper grade areas, resulting in a significant extension of potentially economic CuEq grades outside of a shell as defined strictly on copper cutoff grades.
BAHUERACHI MAIN DEPOSIT, Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources, based
on Copper Equivalent (CuEq) grade cut-offs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CuEq In CuEq
% Situ Cu Au Ag Mo Zn (1)
cutoff Category Tonnes % g/t g/t % % %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.1 Measured 144,641,972 0.34 0.03 3.11 0.007 0.39 0.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 963,917,864 0.24 0.02 2.70 0.006 0.40 0.39
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 1,108,559,836 0.25 0.02 2.75 0.007 0.40 0.41
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 229,514,732 0.21 0.01 2.00 0.005 0.28 0.33
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.2 (2) Measured 125,877,791 0.38 0.04 3.37 0.008 0.41 0.57
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 742,287,815 0.29 0.02 3.18 0.008 0.47 0.46
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 868,165,606 0.30 0.02 3.20 0.008 0.46 0.48
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 161,783,493 0.27 0.02 2.45 0.006 0.35 0.41
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.3 Measured 104,010,758 0.43 0.04 3.72 0.009 0.44 0.64
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 499,781,394 0.35 0.03 3.91 0.009 0.58 0.57
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 603,792,152 0.37 0.03 3.88 0.009 0.55 0.58
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 90,307,127 0.35 0.02 3.18 0.008 0.48 0.53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4 Measured 80,338,770 0.50 0.05 4.19 0.009 0.49 0.73
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 352,792,052 0.41 0.03 4.57 0.009 0.65 0.66
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 433,130,822 0.43 0.04 4.50 0.009 0.62 0.67
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 62,806,915 0.42 0.02 3.56 0.008 0.50 0.62
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 Measured 57,706,773 0.58 0.06 4.87 0.008 0.57 0.83
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 243,864,484 0.47 0.04 5.39 0.009 0.78 0.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 301,571,257 0.50 0.04 5.29 0.009 0.74 0.76
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 47,597,782 0.47 0.02 3.84 0.008 0.57 0.67
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Copper equivalents calculated using US$1.50/lb Cu, $10.00/lb Mo,
$7.00/oz Ag. Gold and Zinc were not factored in the copper equivalent
Calculation. Copper equivalents, metallurgical recoveries and net
smelter returns are assumed to be 100%
(2) A 0.2% CuEq cutoff is consistent with cut off grades currently reported
for other operations in this type of environment.
(3) For modeling purposes, all metal values were capped at the 99(th)
percentile of their normal population distribution.
BAHUERACHI MAIN ZONE, Contained metals based on CuEq Measured, Indicated
and Inferred Resource categories.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CuEq Copper Silver Molybdenum Zinc
% Million Gold Million Million Million
cutoff Category lbs Ounces Ounces lbs lbs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.1 Measured 1,091.84 159,908 14.47 23.41 1,237.93
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 5,059.11 615,660 83.64 135.85 8,469.75
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 6,150.95 775,568 98.11 159.26 9,707.69
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 1,081.74 105,273 14.75 27.26 1,433.15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.2 Measured 1,058.35 152,085 13.64 22.59 1,148.82
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 4,658.91 543,595 75.79 122.57 7,655.36
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 5,717.26 695,680 89.43 145.16 8,804.18
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 952.34 88,039 12.76 22.87 1,255.97
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.3 Measured 988.44 140,195 12.44 19.72 1,018.14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 3,863.97 447,578 62.83 96.27 6,339.95
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 4,852.41 587,772 75.27 115.99 7,358.08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 704.54 59,197 9.22 15.20 943.92
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.4 Measured 879.52 122,764 10.81 15.60 869.78
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 3,206.72 368,519 51.83 72.12 5,034.52
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 4,086.24 491,283 62.64 87.72 5,904.30
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 582.90 47,400 7.20 11.16 688.34
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 Measured 742.56 103,818 9.03 10.16 728.92
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated 2,546.11 296,650 42.26 47.12 4,158.10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
M+I 3,288.68 400,468 51.28 57.27 4,887.01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred 488.88 38,226 5.88 7.91 596.03
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tyler is extremely pleased with the results of this updated study, which continues to demonstrate the presence of a robust polymetallic mineral deposit with world class potential at Bahuerachi. In addition, predictable grade continuity has allowed the company to significantly increase its Indicated resource base, as well as bring a significant amount of material into the measured category.
Tyler will shortly deliver the updated block model to Independent Mining Consultants (IMC) of Tucson in order to expedite preliminary pit and mine planning for the ongoing Scoping Study. While both further exploration and geotechnical drilling continues on site with 3 rigs, Tyler's management is satisfied that scoping based on the current block model and resource base is likely to generate a positive scoping level evaluation for the Bahuerachi Main Deposit.
As this new resource estimates constitutes an increase by significantly more than 100% from the previous estimate, a new independent technical report will be prepared and is expected to be filed on SEDAR within 45 days.
FIELD UPDATE
The scope of field activities has now increased towards the development end in addition to continued drilling.
Permanent survey stations are being set up for mine planning level survey work which will be completed in the coming months. Preparation of access routes to areas that are likely to be used for mine infrastructure, waste and tailings disposal is currently underway for future condemnation and geotechnical drilling.
Drill holes completed and for which assay results are currently outstanding include drill holes BAH-118, 119 and 120 as well as RC-81, 82, 83 and 84. Drilling is continuing with drill holes BAH-120 and 121, and RC-85.
About Tyler
Tyler Resources is a well-funded junior exploration company focused on base and precious metals exploration in Mexico. Tyler's primary project is the Bahuerachi property, which hosts a large mineralized porphyry-skarn copper (Au, Ag, Mo, Zn) complex. The Company is now in the advanced stage of an expanded 35,000 meter combined diamond and reverse circulation drilling program making it one of the most active Canadian junior exploration companies operating in Mexico.
The Qualified Person responsible for the design and implementation of the Field Program as well as the preparation of this news release was J. P. Jutras, P.Geol., and President of the Company. The portion of this release which contains data pertaining to the resource estimate was reviewed by Keith McCandlish, P.Geol, on behalf of Associated Geosciences Ltd. who is acting as the Independent Qualified Person and has prepared the Resource Estimate. The ongoing field exploration program is being carried out with the participation of Dr. Shane William Ebert, Ph.D, P.Geo, Vice President and Director, Grant Couture, M.Sc Geology, Paul Turnbull, B.Sc, P.Geol, Cornell McDowell, B.Sc Geology and Charla Boyer, B.Sc Geology, Consultants to the Company.
Jean Pierre Jutras, President/CEO/Director
The TSX Venture Exchange has neither approved nor disapproved of the contents of this press release.
Cautionary language:
This news release uses the terms "inferred resources" and "indicated resources". The Company advises investors that although these terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations (under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), the US Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these terms. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral resources in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. In addition, "inferred resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, or economic studies except for a "preliminary assessment" as defined under National Instrument 43-101. Under US rules, Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
Except for the historical and present factual information contained herein, the matters set forth in this news release, including words such as "expects", "projects", "plans", "anticipates" and similar expressions, are forward-looking information that represents management of Tyler's internal projections, expectations or beliefs concerning, among other things, future operating results and various components thereof or the economic performance of Tyler. The projections, estimates and beliefs contained in such forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause Tyler's actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, those described in Tyler's filings with the Canadian securities authorities. Accordingly, holders of Tyler shares and potential investors are cautioned that events or circumstances could cause results to differ materially from those predicted. Tyler disclaims any responsibility to update these forward-looking statements.
SOURCE: Tyler Resources Inc.
Tyler Resources Inc. Jean Pierre Jutras (403) 269-6753 (403) 266-2606 (FAX) Website: www.tylerresources.com
Copyright (C) 2007 CCNMatthews. All rights reserved.
© 2007 Stockgroup Media Inc. | Disclaimer
Handel am besten nur über Kanada!!